BUSINESS / MARKETS / POLITICS8 November 2026
← All guides & resources
Trading & risk

Position sizing: work backwards from a loss scenario

Turn an assumed price distance into a whole-share example, then check cash, gaps and costs.

5 min readReviewed 26 Oct 2026
KEEP THIS IN MIND

The amount invested and the loss in a planned exit scenario are different numbers. Neither number is a guarantee about the worst outcome.

Write down the assumptions first

The arithmetic needs an account amount, a chosen risk budget, an assumed entry and an assumed exit. The risk budget is your input to an example, not a percentage the calculator recommends. A long-share example assumes buying first and placing the exit below the entry.

Use one currency and one price unit throughout. A quote in pence is not a quote in pounds. Futures tick values, options multipliers, margin and short positions need different models and are outside the calculator on this page.

Calculate the planned price-distance loss

For a hypothetical £10,000 account and an illustrative 0.5% budget, the amount is £50. An assumed entry of £25 and exit of £24 creates a £1 distance per share. Dividing £50 by £1 gives 50 whole shares, with a purchase value of £1,250.

The calculator rounds down to whole shares and also caps the result at the cash amount entered. It assumes that all that cash is available for this example. It does not inspect existing positions, account restrictions, fees or reserved cash. A result of zero means the entered constraints do not accommodate one whole share.

Planned risk can be exceeded

If a price gaps below the assumed exit, a stop may execute at a worse level. Costs and currency changes can add to the loss. Moving a stop after entry changes the original scenario and should not silently rewrite the record of what was planned.

Several positions may depend on the same event. Adding individual planned losses does not capture every portfolio interaction, but it is a better starting record than assuming each position is isolated. Losses can exceed the amount shown by this simplified model.

Use the number to question the plan

Compare the cash committed, assumed exit distance and resulting loss together. A very tight distance can produce a large calculated quantity even when ordinary price movement could cross that distance. Changing an input to obtain a preferred quantity is different from explaining why the assumption is reasonable.

  • Keep the original plan and the actual fill.
  • Allow separately for costs and available cash.
  • Test an adverse gap as well as the planned exit.
TRY AN EXAMPLE

Put the numbers to work

Illustrative GBP calculations with visible assumptions. These calculators run on this page and do not save your inputs.

WHOLE-SHARE LONG EXAMPLE

Planned position risk

Compare a chosen loss scenario with the cash committed. No risk percentage is recommended.

Formula & assumptions

Budget = cash × chosen percentage, rounded down to the penny. Shares = the smaller of budget ÷ (entry − exit) and cash ÷ entry, rounded down to whole shares. GBP prices accept up to four decimals.

Unleveraged long shares only. This assumes all entered cash is available and excludes costs, currency changes and other holdings. A gap or worse fill can make the loss exceed the figure shown. It is not a maximum-loss calculation.

Read the position-sizing guide →
TRY IT IN YOUR RESEARCH NOTES

Compare a planned exit with a gap

Use the default £25 entry, £24 exit and 50-share example. Then calculate the loss if execution occurred at £22 instead. Record both outcomes before costs and explain why the original £50 was a scenario, not a maximum loss.

Read marks stay in this browser. Return to a path to review its full sequence.

Educational notes, not personalised financial advice. Hypothetical examples and chart shapes are not performance claims or trading signals.